tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14966315.post5957360013263698150..comments2023-04-27T06:00:45.284-04:00Comments on Caught Up in the Craze: Analyzing NLHE:TAP Concepts 46-47Keithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05447889236819454584noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14966315.post-52741702360998163882009-12-11T11:12:46.520-05:002009-12-11T11:12:46.520-05:00This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14966315.post-53279772283042334892009-12-10T00:41:48.403-05:002009-12-10T00:41:48.403-05:00You don't necessarily need to have a good idea...You don't necessarily need to have a good idea what your opponent has in order to have a good idea of what he does NOT have. As long as you're pretty sure he does not have a weak hand, this concept can apply.Keithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05447889236819454584noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-14966315.post-7752773582490760452009-12-09T18:02:49.801-05:002009-12-09T18:02:49.801-05:00I don't understand concept 47. If you have a g...I don't understand concept 47. If you have a good idea what your opponent has, then you have an idea whether or not he is bluffing, right? I mean, why not just say, "if your opponent has a hand that is worth a raise, he is not bluffing?"Craig Bergerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06895405601179743376noreply@blogger.com